| Theme 1: What ‘package’ of HIV treatment and care services should be provided in different settings? |
|
|
|
|
The ‘best’ package of HIV care will depend on the setting and the aims and objectives of the particular programme. How can the need for rapid scale up be balanced with capacity building and strengthening of health systems? Should second line treatment be included? What effect does decentralisation of treatment have on access and quality? Current Theme 1 Research Generated by Evidence for ActionMonitoring and EvaluationThe issue of how to monitor and evaluate HIV treatment and care systems is of great importance. Many country programmes have to report to multiple donors and stakeholders. These donors often recommend different data collection and calculation methods for outcome indicators. The lack of standardisation between donors and programmes results in the collection and reporting of multiple outcome data by clinics, which is costly and time-consuming, and also make it difficult to compare performance within and between programmes. Evidence for Action partners, led by MRC CTU, are working on a project to identify which outcome indicator(s) best predict long-term survival and the emergence of drug resistance. A Small-Initiative Grant-funded preliminary study is being carried out to identify sites, methods of data collection and to meet with key stakeholders from the donor community. A proposal for funding the main study, which will assess which outcomes and indicators best correlate with long-term patient survival, thereby identifying which should be collected for ARV programmes to monitor their performance within resource-limited settings, is being submitted to Wellcome Trust. GuidelinesIHAA are leading the development of guidelines which will be published as WHO’s guidelines on the health sector’s essential package of HIV treatment, care and support, to be published later in 2008. Other theme 1 research |



